Quick Note on Knowledge Arguments

The characterization of Kripke/Jackson’s arguments as showing an epistemic, but not metaphysical, gap seems to be somewhat weak. Perhaps the reason for the epistemic gap is a metaphysical gap – instead of simply a conceptual inability or failure on our part to recognize physicalist reduction of qualia.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s