On Science

Aristotle said that all men by nature desire to know – and I think it’s safe to say that this desire, this urge to know, understand, come to grips with the world around us is what drives science. There’s the practical side of science – things like microwaves, televisons, iPods, e-readers, the internet are all products of scientific research experimentation, study, debate and a little bit of luck. There’s the more fundamental, but perhaps less immediately practical, side of science – for example, quantum mechanics and a lot of modern cosmology and physics. Less “practical” but perhaps no less necessary.

Now, before you get to science, there’s a bit of groundwork to be laid. Some basic things need to be at the foundation of science for it to proceed or even be conceivable. Things like something to study – and even before that, the intelligibility of whatever is under scrutiny. This is a pretty basic thing – for science to be possible, its object of study (broadly, nature) has to be intelligible. That’s kind of a ‘duh’ thing.

Now before we get to the intelligibility of nature, there’s a bit more groundwork to be laid. not only does nature have to be intelligible, people (like scientists) have to believe that it is, in fact, intelligible. If one didn’t believe that it was, one would probably not be too driven to try to understand it. If I don’t believe that Detroit is the capital of Michigan, I probably won’t be too driven to plan a trip to explore Detroit. This isn’t a perfect metaphor but it conveys the point.

As obvious as this may seem, there have been people who denied that nature constituted an intelligible object for study, in spirit if not in fact. Heraclitus comes to mind – all is flux is not something germane to scientific study. The same (but opposite) goes for Parmenides.

So nature has to be intelligible, and people have to believe that it is intelligible, for science to proceed. An epistemology germane to such a belief was provided by the theism of the Judeo-Christian tradition – according to which God was a rational creator whose creation reflected that rationality by virtue of its order and regularity – ‘but thou hast ordered all things in measure, and number, and weight.’ (Wisdom 11:21)

This belief in the natural intelligibility of the created order was developed in the middle ages, along with the idea of the fit of the intellect to reality – the mind is predisposed to the rational created order. These beliefs laid the groundwork for the enterprise of modern science – indeed, the medieval era was one of scientific, mathematical and philosophical discovery and development. Fr. Stanley Jaki has developed this argument with great detail, and a quick search of his name on this blog will show several sections of his writings in which he does so.

Now, what I am not saying is this: that every practicing scientist has to believe in God. Clearly they don’t (even if most of the great creative scientists in history either were devout Christians or held to some form of theistic belief). What I am saying is that the epistemology which makes science possible, the belief in an intelligible external reality open to investigation, is a product of Christian theism and the epistemology contained therein, i.e., belief in a rational Creator whose creation reflects His rationality by its own rationality.

7 thoughts on “On Science

  1. Kevin Davis December 20, 2013 / 8:58 pm

    These intellectual preconditions for science are among the many things that contemporary skeptics take for granted. I believe there are also moral preconditions that we take for granted, and both the intellectual and the moral preconditions are being thoroughly undermined as we drift into decadence. We are the selfish and spoiled children of prior, more impressive generations.

    Do you recommend any Jaki book in particular?


    • whitefrozen December 20, 2013 / 9:07 pm

      ‘The Road of Science and the Ways to God’, is my personal favourite book, and IMO one of the best philosophy of science/metaphysics books available. Most of the quoted sections on my blog come from that book. The next one would be ‘The Relevance of Physics’, which was huge, but also very good. A few other ones to pick up after those two would be ‘The Origin of Science and the Science of its Origin’, ‘Chesterton, A Seer of Science’, ‘The Milky Way: An ELusive Road for Science’. He wrote something like 40 books, but those are some pretty good ones.


      • Kevin Davis December 21, 2013 / 11:00 am

        Thanks. I’m actually teaching a Sunday school last this spring (for 12 weeks) about modernism/postmodernism — obviously I will be rendering these issues as non-technical as possible — and I want to spend quite a lot of time on science, since the evangelical church (and we are evangelical) has been unnecessarily disturbed over this issue.


        • whitefrozen December 21, 2013 / 12:37 pm

          No problem. Yeah it’s definitely something that needs to be addressed – I know Alister McGrath has written on the subject, and John Lennox has some great little videos on youtube about faith/reason/history that avoids feeling like cheap apologetics. BioLogos as well has been doing some good work in this area as well, and I think they’re very much worth using as a resource.


    • Joel December 22, 2013 / 8:04 pm

      I would reccommend “God’s Philosophers/The Genesis of Science” (different European and US names and don’t let the US publisher scare you off) by James Hannam as well. It’s an interesting and even fun read, and he is very well-educated on the subject.


      • whitefrozen December 22, 2013 / 8:26 pm

        That’s a very good book – another one is ‘Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages’. Medieval science is a fascinating, fascinating subject.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s