I’m something of a philosopher and theologian – my general areas of interest in philosophy are ethics, logic, language and epistemology. Wittgenstein I find fascinating. Theologically, my interests are pretty broad – from ancient Hebrew thought to early Christian to the medieval Scholastics to the Reformation to the present. I like Barth, Wright, Lewis, the Early Church Fathers, Calvin, Luther, Anselm, Aquinas, Wolterstorff, Pascal , Bonhoeffer, Augustine, Heschel, Wesley, Jewish Theology, Eastern Orthodox theology – if it’s theological, chances are I like it. I have a good handle on the doctrine of justification – I suppose I’d have to say that’s my strong point.
Theology proper begins in worship, however. One must worship God before one can know Him – this is an underlying presupposition I hold. I will generally refrain from abstract discoursing about God in a philosophical sense – though it’s been known to happen, for better or for worse. I don’t consider God an object to be proved though good arguments can point one to God. The difference between the god of the philosophers and the God of Israel is a simple one: the god of philosophy is that which is – the God of Israel is He Who Is.
I’m also an aspiring literary critic/theorist. C.S. Lewis, Tolkien, Cormac McCarthy, Hemingway, Milton, Dostoevsky and Faulkner are my boys. I find Russian literary theory/philosophy to be very interesting. I love medieval literature and am an amateur Tolkien scholar.
There will be a fair amount of quoted/non-original material here. This is not a lack of independent thought – it is the interaction with the living, breathing Christian tradition. It’s part of the Communion of Saints – life with the Church past, present and future. Christianity does not and cannot exist as a vacuum – those who have gone before us in the Church we cherish and love. My own thoughts and commentary on Scripture, theological/philosophical issues and various thinkers are just a few tiny drops in the vast stream of Christian thought, but I count myself as privileged to write in that tradition.
I also like history – I generally know the history of whatever I’m talking about. I think that’s important.
And that’s all, folks.
Your blog does not read as a straw “dog”
Thanks for being a good and faithful disciple…
Thanks for the kind words – I’m trying my best
As a regular reader, I would echo what nelsonpage says above, and add that in a world of sub-straw, even straw is strong.
In line with that, this quote might tickle you:
‘If by grace what I say has in any respect any validity,
it is, of course, only one facet of a truth incalculably rich.’
JRR TOLKIEN, ‘On Fairy Stories’, 1939.
I would wholeheartedly agree with Tolkien there – and I appreciate the encouragement